By: dmc-admin//December 26, 2001//
Willie C. Fondren appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Fondren makes three almost incomprehensible arguments in support of sentence modification; as best we can tell, Fondren argues that his trial counsel was ineffective, that the trial court erred in not citing any precedent in support of its actions, and that the trial court improperly failed to hold a Machner hearing.
We reject all of Fondren’s arguments and affirm the order denying sentence modification.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Kenosha County, Wagner-Malloy, J., Snyder, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Not given
For Respondent: Not given