01-1047-FT Morse v. Kloss

By: dmc-admin//December 26, 2001//

Listen to this article

Daniel and Karen Morse appeal a judgment dismissing their adverse possession and prescriptive easement claims against Ernest and Joyce Kloss’s adjoining lake lot. The Morses raise three issues: whether (1) the findings of fact support adverse possession or a prescriptive easement; (2) the evidence supports the court’s determination that their possession and use were not notorious; and (3) the evidence supports the court’s findings that these were wild lands, rather than seasonal recreational property.

Because the evidence supports the trial court’s ruling that the Morses’ use of the shoreline did not entitle them to an award of adverse possession or a prescriptive easement, we affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Oneida County, Mangerson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael J. Stingl, Wausau

For Respondent: John J. Hogan, Rhinelander; Jennifer A. Stuber, Rhinelander

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event