By: dmc-admin//December 17, 2001//
Cain Wiskow appeals a judgment convicting him of burglary to a dwelling as a repeater. He argues that the trial court erroneously denied his suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights.
Because Wiskow’s mother validly consented to the search, we reject his arguments and affirm the judgment.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Trempealeau County, Radcliffe, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Dennis Schertz, Hudson
For Respondent: Peter P. Gierok, Whitehall; Francisco X. Vasquez, Madison; Susan M. Crawford, Madison