01-0386 In Re the Marriage of: Swetlik v. Swetlik

By: dmc-admin//December 17, 2001//

Listen to this article

William Swetlik appeals an order denying his motion to modify his $4,000 per month child support obligation. He argues that the trial court failed to apply the correct legal standard in determining that modification was inappropriate. He further contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by determining that his former wife, Cheryl Swetlik, did not use the child support as hidden maintenance to subsidize her lifestyle. He also claims that because the $4,000 had been set when he had three minor children, it is now excessive because only one of the children remains a minor.

Because the record discloses a rational basis for the court’s determination, we affirm the order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Brown County, Bischel, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Sharren B. Rose, Green Bay

For Respondent: Alf R H R Langan, Green Bay

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event