Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0356-CR State v. Stewart

By: dmc-admin//December 10, 2001//

01-0356-CR State v. Stewart

By: dmc-admin//December 10, 2001//

Listen to this article

Robert Stewart, appealing pro se, raises numerous issues challenging his conviction, after a jury trial, for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), fourth offense. The State concedes that the trial court failed to conduct a colloquy to determine whether Stewart voluntarily waived his right to counsel. Consequently, the State suggests that this court remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine if Stewart’s waiver of his right to counsel was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.

This court agrees and remands the matter on that issue.

However, this court rejects Stewart’s remaining issues.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Langlade County, Jansen, J., Cane, C.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Robert D. Stewart, Pelican Lake

For Respondent: Ralph M. Uttke, Antigo

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests