Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3383 State v. Olson

By: dmc-admin//December 3, 2001//

00-3383 State v. Olson

By: dmc-admin//December 3, 2001//

Listen to this article

“Here, the reasonable suspicion that Olson was involved in the burglary, the strong governmental interest in solving crimes, and the purposeful avoidance of the police by Olson make Bach’s traffic stop a reasonable one under the facts and circumstances of this case. Accordingly, Olson’s evidentiary challenge must fail, and any statements made by her during the traffic stop are admissible. We therefore uphold Olson’s judgment of conviction.”

Judgment affirmed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Haughney, J., Anderson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Daniel P. Fay, Pewaukee; Elizabeth A. Cavendish-Sosinski, Pewaukee

For Respondent: Paul E. Bucher, Waukesha; James M. Freimuth, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests