01-0368 In Re the Marriage of: Otte v. Otte

By: dmc-admin//November 5, 2001//

Listen to this article

Yvonne Otte appeals from an order modifying her child support obligation and denying her motion to have Daniel Otte held in contempt for denying her physical placement of their son on “no school” days. Yvonne argues that she is entitled to support set according to the shared-time payer formula. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in deviating from the shared-time payer formula and in setting child support based on a share of variable expenses. Given ambiguity in the parties’ agreement for physical custody on “no school” days, the circuit court’s refusal to hold Daniel in contempt was proper.

We affirm the order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Sheboygan County, Stengel, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Mark S. Des Rochers, St. Nazianz

For Respondent: Daniel Otte, Sheboygan Falls

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event