Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0695-CR State v. Barbosa

By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//

01-0695-CR State v. Barbosa

By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//

Listen to this article

Agripino Barbosa appeals from three judgments of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. Barbosa argues that the trial court relied on inaccurate information in sentencing and therefore sentence modification is warranted. While inaccurate information was presented to the trial court at sentencing, the trial court did not rely on the majority of the inaccurate information in arriving at its sentencing conclusion. Furthermore, the remaining inaccurate information had only a de minimus effect on the trial court’s decision.

We therefore affirm the order denying sentence modification and affirm the judgments of conviction.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Bastianelli, J., Snyder, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Terry Evans Williams, Delavan

For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Shelly J. Rusch, Kenosha

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests