Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3096 In Re the Paternity of Nina R: Ronald J., et al. v. Lisa R., et al.

By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//

00-3096 In Re the Paternity of Nina R: Ronald J., et al. v. Lisa R., et al.

By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//

Listen to this article

Lisa R. and Sandra H. appeal from an order and a judgment appointing Laurel W. guardian of Nina R. Lisa (Nina’s mother) and Sandra (Nina’s maternal grandmother) claim that there was insufficient evidence to terminate Sandra’s guardianship, that the trial court erred in transferring guardianship to Laurel (Nina’s paternal grandmother), that the trial court erroneously excluded certain evidence, and that the guardian ad litem submitted facts not contained in the record.

Because there was sufficient evidence to terminate Sandra’s guardianship, because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it awarded guardianship to Laurel, because the trial court’s evidentiary ruling was not an erroneous exercise of discretion, and because the guardian ad litem is permitted to make recommendations, we affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Guolee, J., Wedemeyer, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Lisa M. Richards, West Allis

For Respondent: Thomas D. Kuehl, Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests