By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//
By: dmc-admin//October 29, 2001//
Lisa R. and Sandra H. appeal from an order and a judgment appointing Laurel W. guardian of Nina R. Lisa (Nina’s mother) and Sandra (Nina’s maternal grandmother) claim that there was insufficient evidence to terminate Sandra’s guardianship, that the trial court erred in transferring guardianship to Laurel (Nina’s paternal grandmother), that the trial court erroneously excluded certain evidence, and that the guardian ad litem submitted facts not contained in the record.
Because there was sufficient evidence to terminate Sandra’s guardianship, because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it awarded guardianship to Laurel, because the trial court’s evidentiary ruling was not an erroneous exercise of discretion, and because the guardian ad litem is permitted to make recommendations, we affirm.
Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Guolee, J., Wedemeyer, P.J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Lisa M. Richards, West Allis
For Respondent: Thomas D. Kuehl, Milwaukee