Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3365 Mattson, et al. v. Peterson

By: dmc-admin//October 22, 2001//

00-3365 Mattson, et al. v. Peterson

By: dmc-admin//October 22, 2001//

Listen to this article

The Polk County Child Support Agency appeals from an order denying its motion to modify Roger Peterson’s child support obligation. The agency argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying its motion. Specifically, the agency contends that the trial court erred by (1) failing to conclude that Peterson had hidden additional income; and (2) refusing to consider rental income for purposes of calculating Peterson’s child support obligation.

We reject these arguments and affirm the order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Polk County, Erickson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jeffrey B. Fuge, Balsam Lake

For Respondent: James A. Krupa, Amery

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests