By: dmc-admin//October 22, 2001//
The Polk County Child Support Agency appeals from an order denying its motion to modify Roger Peterson’s child support obligation. The agency argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying its motion. Specifically, the agency contends that the trial court erred by (1) failing to conclude that Peterson had hidden additional income; and (2) refusing to consider rental income for purposes of calculating Peterson’s child support obligation.
We reject these arguments and affirm the order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Polk County, Erickson, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Jeffrey B. Fuge, Balsam Lake
For Respondent: James A. Krupa, Amery