By: dmc-admin//October 15, 2001//
Daniel K. Nett appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him. He argues on appeal that the trial court improperly allowed the introduction of other acts evidence.
Because we conclude that the evidence was properly admitted, we affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Calumet County, Poppy, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Michael G. Artery, Delavan
For Respondent: Kenneth R. Kratz, Chilton; Kathleen M. Ptacek, Madison