Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Case Digests / 00-2245 Ruege, et al. v. Dougherty, et al.

00-2245 Ruege, et al. v. Dougherty, et al.

Ruth A. Ruege appeals from the judgment dismissing this action. Ruege argues on appeal that her informed consent cause of action should not have been dismissed by directed verdict and that the court improperly excluded certain testimony.

Because we conclude that the court properly granted the motion for a directed verdict and excluded the testimony, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Foster, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Rick D. Steinberg, Brookfield

For Respondent: Mary L. Ratzel, Milwaukee; Clayton I. Riddle, Milwaukee; David F. Andres, Milwaukee; Paul J. Kelly, Milwaukee


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*