Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 00-2665 U.S. v. Higgins

00-2665 U.S. v. Higgins

"There is no indication that the district court believed that Higgins intended to actually deprive ONB of the full $420,000 he purported to be depositing, as opposed to merely impressing the bank with his importance and then using some smaller sum as he did with the Lexus purchases. If anything, the district court's statement leaves ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*