Home / Case Digests / 01-2006 Ruth v. U.S.

01-2006 Ruth v. U.S.

"Ruth asserted in his Rule 33 motion that his new evidence of Countryside Fragrances's legitimate and independent existence supported his claim of innocence. He did not argue that the government violated Brady by failing to disclose this information, nor did he assert that the existence of this information rendered his sentence excessive or called into ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *