Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3431-CR State v. Scott

By: dmc-admin//September 17, 2001//

00-3431-CR State v. Scott

By: dmc-admin//September 17, 2001//

Listen to this article

William R. Scott appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence after he pled guilty to operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Scott claims: (1) the trial court erred when it determined that the Criminal Penalties Study Committee’s proposal to reclassify the crime of operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent was not a new factor; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed what he claims was an unduly harsh and disproportionate sentence; and (3) the sentence imposed by the trial court violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution because it is disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Lamelas, Crawford, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Scott A. Kzabrowicz, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Michael R. Klos, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests