Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 00-3176 State v. Hughes

00-3176 State v. Hughes

This is so because, "the jury's unanimous findings (confirmed when the trial court polled the jury) that Hughes possessed cocaine with the intent to deliver it, and that he also possessed that cocaine were not inconsistent. Additionally, Hughes does not explain beyond mere rhetoric how the jury's unanimous findings that Hughes both possessed cocaine and ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*