Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-2897-CR State v. Spiller

By: dmc-admin//September 17, 2001//

00-2897-CR State v. Spiller

By: dmc-admin//September 17, 2001//

Listen to this article

Jerjuan D. Spiller appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief after a jury found him guilty of: two counts of kidnapping, two counts of first-degree sexual assault, two counts of armed robbery, and exposing a sex organ, all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his motion for a mistrial; and (3) he is entitled to a discretionary reversal under Wis. Stat. sec. 752.35 because the real controversy was not fully and fairly tried.

Because Spiller’s postconviction motion failed to allege sufficient facts to warrant a Machner hearing on his ineffective assistance claim, because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it denied his motion for a mistrial, and because he is not entitled to a discretionary reversal, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Lamelas, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Edward J. Hunt, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Daniel J. O’Brien, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests