Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-2302 Meyer, et al. v. Palmquist

By: dmc-admin//September 10, 2001//

00-2302 Meyer, et al. v. Palmquist

By: dmc-admin//September 10, 2001//

Listen to this article

David and Ricky Palmquist appeal a judgment declaring that Fred and Maureen Meyer, and Maurice and Lillian Secore acquired by adverse possession land previously titled to the Palmquists. The Palmquists argue that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s special verdict. Alternatively, the Palmquists argue that the trial court erred by denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

We reject the Palmquists’ arguments and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Barron County, Brunner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael D. Schwartz, Chanhassen, MN

For Respondent: Joe Thrasher, Rice Lake

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests