00-2244 Hardy v. Hardy, n/k/a Trudell

By: dmc-admin//September 10, 2001//

Listen to this article

George Hardy appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay a certain sum to Christine Trudell, his former wife. The issue is whether Trudell’s motion seeking to enforce the judgment was barred by a statute of limitations or laches.

We conclude it was not, and we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Florence County, Kennedy, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Mikael G. Hahner, Iron Mountain

For Respondent: David J. Herrick, Niagara

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event