Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0578-CR State v. Yench

By: dmc-admin//September 4, 2001//

01-0578-CR State v. Yench

By: dmc-admin//September 4, 2001//

Listen to this article

Leroy A. Yench appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), second offense. Yench pled guilty to the charge following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of a blood test obtained pursuant to the Implied Consent Law. On appeal, Yench contends that the arresting officer did not exercise “reasonable diligence” to accommodate his request for the police department’s alternate test under the Implied Consent Law as required by State v. Renard, 123 Wis.2d 458, 367 N.W.2d 237 (Ct. App. 1985).

We disagree and therefore affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Ozaukee County, Wolfgram, J., Anderson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: John S. Schiro, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Sandy A. Williams, Port Washington; Adam Y. Gerol, Port Washington

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests