Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Case Digests / 01-0284-CR State v. Fitzl

01-0284-CR State v. Fitzl

Jessie Fitzl appeals his judgment of conviction for substantial battery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Fitzl claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by excluding evidence of events that took place outside the bar where the battery occurred; (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; and (3) he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice.

We disagree and affirm the conviction.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Rusk County, Henderson, J., Per Curiam


For Appellant: Dennis Schertz, Hudson

For Respondent: Christian R. Larsen, Madison; Kathleen A. Pakes, Ladysmith

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *