01-0284-CR State v. Fitzl

By: dmc-admin//August 27, 2001//

By: dmc-admin//August 27, 2001//

Listen to this article

Jessie Fitzl appeals his judgment of conviction for substantial battery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Fitzl claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by excluding evidence of events that took place outside the bar where the battery occurred; (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; and (3) he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice.

We disagree and affirm the conviction.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Rusk County, Henderson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Dennis Schertz, Hudson

For Respondent: Christian R. Larsen, Madison; Kathleen A. Pakes, Ladysmith

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People