Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-1889-CR State v. Sexton

By: dmc-admin//August 13, 2001//

00-1889-CR State v. Sexton

By: dmc-admin//August 13, 2001//

Listen to this article

Bradley W. Sexton appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of five counts of felony failure to support a child. Sexton argues that this court should exercise its discretionary power of reversal pursuant to Wis. Stat. sec. 752.35 because justice has miscarried and the real controversy has not been fully tried. Specifically, Sexton contends that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury; and (2) the trial court erroneously excluded medical evidence generated after Dec. 31, 1998. Sexton also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions.

We reject Sexton’s arguments and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Oconto County, Delforge, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jane K. Smith, Oconto Falls

For Respondent: Robert J. Mraz, Oconto; Sandra L. Nowack, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests