99-2030 Harding v. Kumar

By: dmc-admin//July 23, 2001//

By: dmc-admin//July 23, 2001//

Listen to this article

Accordingly, the trial court’s attempt to start the appeal-clock anew via its June 16, 1999, decision was a nullity, as was the July 28, 1999 judgment entered thereon.

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot the appeal by BSTV, Chicago Insurance and Harding (in his capacity as counterclaim defendant) from the June 16, 1999 decision and order, Kumar’s “cross-appeal” from the July 28, 1999 judgment, and Harding’s (in his capacity as plaintiff) new “cross-appeal” from the Nov. 5, 1998 judgment.

Appeal and cross-appeals dismissed.

Publication in the official reports is recommended.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Schellinger, J., Fine, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: John R. Sosey, Brookfield; Jennifer A. Slater Carlson, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Charles H. Barr, Milwaukee; William W. Graper, Milwaukee

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People