00-3410-CR State v. Rumlow

By: dmc-admin//July 23, 2001//

Listen to this article

Ryan Rumlow appeals a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. He claims that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to administer a preliminary breath test. Rumlow thus contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence.

This court concludes that the officer had a sufficient legal basis to administer a preliminary breath test and therefore the judgment is affirmed.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Dunn County, Stewart, J., Hoover, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: William A. Schembera, Menomonie

For Respondent: James M. Peterson, Menomonie

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event