00-2427 Sentry Insurance v. Davis, et al.

By: dmc-admin//July 9, 2001//

Listen to this article

Sentry Insurance Company appeals an order which dismissed its action for a judgment declaring that its policy did not provide liability coverage to its insured, Rodney Davis, for an accident in which his vehicle was involved. The trial court declined to consider a document Sentry produced after discovery and briefing deadlines had expired. Based on the record with the document excluded, the court determined “as a matter of law, that Sentry owes coverage to” Davis. Sentry appeals the subsequent order dismissing its declaratory judgment action and an order denying its motion for reconsideration. Carolyn and Anthony Beckham, who were also involved in the accident, and their insurer, respond. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Donegan, J., Deininger, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James M. Fredericks, Milwaukee; Patrick S. Nolan, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Michael F. Hart, Milwaukee; Michael S. Winter, Milwaukee, et al.

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event