By: dmc-admin//July 2, 2001//
“Konen authored and submitted to Union officials a document containing
baseless allegations of serious criminal misconduct by Company and Union
officials. When the Company terminated him, Konen offered his Union no
defense for his actions, except an apology and an admission that he was
wrong to have produced and submitted the bribery allegations. The Union
was justified in not challenging his termination based on this conduct,
and thus Konen’s LMRA claim fails. Konen’s LMRDA claim is also
unavailing because he was never disciplined by Local 200, as he always
maintained all of the rights and status of a full Union member, and
there is no evidence that the Union caused his termination.”
Affirmed.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin, Clevert, J., Manion, J.