Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

98-0445 Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2001//

98-0445 Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2001//

Listen to this article

“In sum, in view of the current state of the record, we conclude that the Johnsons have presented claims upon which relief may be granted. The record is insufficient for us to determine whether public policy considerations bar the Johnsons’ claims. Further, the factual record is insufficient for us to determine whether the statute of limitations bars the Johnsons’ claim against RMH. As a result, we reverse the court of appeals’ decision, which upheld the circuit court’s dismissal of the complaint.”

Reversed and remanded.

Court of Appeals; Bablitch, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: William Smoler, Madison; Gregory P. Seibold, Madison

For Respondent: Lori Gendelman, Jeffrey J.P. Conta, Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests