Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 00-3816Holman v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

00-3816Holman v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Under [Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)], dependency requirements violate the Equal Protection Clause. But [Heckler v. Mathews, 465 U.S. 728 (1984)] recognized that such a requirement may be revived if it is substantially related to a legitimate purpose and narrowly tailored to achieve that goal. Under our reasoning in Frock, sec. 231c(g)(4) is ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*