99-3291-CR, 99-3292-CR, 99-3293-CRState v. Spaulding

By: dmc-admin//June 4, 2001//

Listen to this article

Kenneth D. Spaulding appeals from judgments entered on jury verdicts convicting him of: two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child, one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child, and one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He asserts three claims of trial-court error: 1) that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in not severing the various incidents, which had been joined for trial; 2) that the trial court erroneously permitted the State’s expert on child sexual-assault victims to testify; and 3) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were consolidated for purposes of this appeal. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Richard D. Martin, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, et al.

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event