Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 99-2317 Tayborn v. Scott

99-2317 Tayborn v. Scott

"Tayborn argues that several inconsistencies in his testimony rendered his testimony perjurious and that the prosecution should have known it was perjurious. However, Tayborn only points to collateral inconsistencies in Murchinson's testimony like: 1) whether he heard a noise before looking down from the porch to see the attackers; 2) whether he gave the police ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*