Quantcast

U.S. Supreme Court justices rule in closely-watched class action case (access required)

A consumer class action should not have been certified because the plaintiffs’ expert testimony failed to establish that the case was susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5-4.

Employment — pregnancy discrimination — retaliation (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, June 12th, 2012 at 11:06 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

11-3387 Arizanovska v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

10-277 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. Dukes (access required)

POSTED: Monday, June 20th, 2011 at 2:08 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Civil Procedure
Class actions

Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202