2009AP3075 State v. Ryan
2010AP2992 Weather Shield Mgf., et al. v. Compass Group USA, et al.
11-2298 Keeton v. Morningstar, Inc.
2010AP331 Dugan, et al. v. Dugan, et al.
Check out these interesting legal blogs:
Civil Rights Qualified immunity; summary judgment; appeal A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits. A qualified immunity plea, not upheld at the summary judgment stage, may be pursued at trial, but at that stage, the plea [...]
Contracts Summary judgment Where a party presented only hearsay in opposition to a summary judgment motion, the motion was properly granted. “Midwest also attacks the evidence MMG submitted in support of its claim that it fulfilled the terms of its contract. Midwest suggests that to succeed on summary judgment MMG must ‘demonstrate that the monies [...]
Debtor and Creditor Credit card agreement default; summary judgment; sufficiency of affidavits This case arises out of a small claims collection action alleging that Greg Griswold defaulted on credit card payments owed to HSBC Bank Nevada. Griswold appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to HSBC and the court’s order denying his motion for [...]
Minneapolis – Beginning next month, federal court practitioners may need to make some adjustments to their summary judgment motion practice.
Property Foreclosure; summary judgment Barbara Rohlf and William Wilde appeal from judgments of foreclosure on their homestead in Winnebago County (hereafter the Oshkosh home) and property they own in Green Lake County (hereafter the Markesan property). They argue that Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP did not establish that it was the holder of the note [...]
Civil Rights Warrantless searches; summary judgment Brian E. Davis, pro se, appeals from the judgment dismissing his action against the City of Milwaukee (City) after he presented his case at trial. See Wis. Stat. § 805.14(3) (2007-08). Davis argues that the trial court should have granted summary judgment on his constitutional unreasonable search claims because [...]
Wiretap Act Summary judgment A plaintiff suing under the Wiretap Act is not required to produce direct evidence of intentional interception to survive summary judgment. “Here, the plaintiffs testified that they did not turn on the dictation machine that recorded their private conversation, but that during their conversation Freed walked in and picked up papers [...]
