2011AP2958-CR State v. Reeverts
12-1223 Klene v. Napolitano
11-2721 Tapia-Lemos v. Holder
11-2246 Rivas-Melendrez v. Napolitano
11-3643 Marinov v. Holder
11-3142 Jawad v. Holder
10-1542 Holder v. Gutierrez
11-2648 Delgado v. Holder
11-2444 Munoz-Pacheco v. Holder
2011AP377 In re the estate of Rebecca Derzon v. Johnson
10-577 Kawashima v. Holder
11-2346 Khodja v. Holder
11-8017 LG Display Co., Ltd., v. Madigan
11-1622 Gourche v. Holder
Immigration
Removal; Sudan
Civil Procedure
Removal; attorney fees
Immigration
Removal; aggravated felonies
Immigration
Removal; withholding
Civil Procedure
Removal; remand
Immigration
Removal; equal protection
Immigration Removal; motions to reopen Where an alien did not timely file a motion to reopen a removal order, his petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. “Tapia received the order on November 1. His signature is on the order; so is his thumbprint. Perhaps the Department did not ‘serve’ the order in the [...]
Civil Procedure Class actions; removal Individual suits cannot be removed to federal court based only on an expectation that the cases will be consolidated into a class action. “The proposal must be to the court in which the suits are pending, but if the plaintiffs’ statement to the state court that we quoted was a [...]
Immigration Asylum; removal; credibility determinations An IJ did not err when she made an adverse credibility determination regarding appellant’s claims in an asylum application that the Chinese government had forced his wife’s abortion and sterilization, where there were inconsistencies in his testimony and the DHS submitted evidence that the certificates of those procedures were falsified. [...]
Immigration Removal; undue hardship It was error to deny a request for cancellation of removal based on undue hardship to the claimant’s children, on the basis that the claimant’s husband could care for them, when the husband also faced removal. “We find that Champion’s allegation that the BIA ignored the evidence she presented concerning Yomi’s [...]
United States Court of Appeals CIVIL OPINIONS Immigration Removal Even if aliens did not engage in fraud in obtaining I-551 passport stamps, they are removable where they did not obtain them leally. “The Mozdzens argue that they were lawfully admitted in 1999, but the definition of admission for an alien and someone with LPR status [...]
