Quantcast

2010AP1947-CR State v. Riley (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, August 30th, 2011 at 10:42 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Extended Supervision
Revocation; reconfinement

2010AP681, 2010AP682, 2010AP683 State v. Kamakian (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 at 1:13 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Sentencing Reconfinement Kelly Kamakian believes that his reconfinement term was eighteen months; the circuit court found that the term was thirty-six months. In these consolidated appeals, Kelly Kamakian appeals from the circuit court’s orders rejecting his claim. We conclude that the reconfinement orders control, and the reconfinement term was thirty-six months. We therefore affirm the [...]

2010AP988-CR State v. Murphy (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011 at 2:17 pm

BY: rick.benedict

Sentencing Reconfinement Shawn Joseph Murphy appeals orders of the circuit court reconfining him for the maximum-available two years and four days and denying his motion for a new reconfinement hearing. Murphy contends that the court erroneously exercised its discretion in setting his reconfinement term. We disagree with Murphy and, therefore, affirm the orders. This opinion [...]

2009AP2695-CR State v. Lipsey (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, October 19th, 2010 at 3:17 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Sentencing Reconfinement Samuel M. Lipsey appeals from an order for reconfinement entered after revocation of his extended supervision and from an order denying his subsequent motion for modification. Lipsey asserts that the circuit court’s order imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement was “unduly harsh.” We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion [...]

2009AP3195-CR State v. Wal (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, October 19th, 2010 at 3:16 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Sentencing Reconfinement Jeremy D. Wall appeals from a reconfinement order entered after the revocation of his extended supervision and from a postconviction order denying his motion seeking a new reconfinement hearing. The issues are whether the circuit court adequately explained its reasons for imposing the reconfinement period that it did, and whether it explained how [...]

Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202