Free Newsletter
2010AP1745 State ex rel. Hatchett v. Schwarz
Probation and Parole Revocation Antoine Hatchett, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order denying his request for relief in a certiorari review of the decision to revoke his probation. Hatchett argues that his probation should not have been revoked because the basis for revocation—Hatchett’s refusal to sign a statement given to his probation agent—was […]
2010AP83-CR State v. Walker
Probation and Parole Revocation Jason Walker was sentenced after revocation of his probation. The sentencing court considered probation violations that Walker denied committing. Walker argues the court could not consider the violations because the State did not prove he committed them. He contends the sentencing court was obligated to resolve the factual dispute about whether […]
2009AP2022-CR, 2009AP2023-CR State v. Pegues
Probation and Parole Extension of probation Sergio M. Pegues has appealed from an order entered on July 23, 2009, in the circuit court for Racine county, the Honorable Dennis J. Barry presiding, denying Pegues’ motion for postconviction relief in Racine county circuit court case No. 2006CF260. He has also appealed from an order entered by […]
2009AP2216 State v. Smith
Probation and Parole Extension of probation Curtis P. Smith appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08). He argues that his probation was illegally extended in violation of his due process rights and that as a result, his revocation is a nullity. We disagree and affirm. This opinion […]
2009AP2877 State ex rel. Blecker v. Schwartz
Probation and Parole Revocation David A. Blecker appeals a judgment affirming the revocation of his probation. He contends the revocation was based on insufficient evidence that was not credible, probative or substantial, in part because it depended on statements that should be considered part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him […]
2010AP83-CR State v. Walker
Probation and Parole Sentencing after revocation; burden of proof At a sentencing after revocation of probation, the defendant has the burden of rebutting the allegations that led to revocation. “[T]o prove his due process rights were violated, we conclude Walker has the burden to show that the court relied on factually inaccurate information. See id., […]
Polls
Loading ...Legal News
- State Bar leaders remain deeply divided over special purpose trust
- Former Wisconsin college chancellor fired over porn career is fighting to keep his faculty post
- Pecker says he pledged to be Trump campaign’s ‘eyes and ears’ during 2016 race
- A conservative quest to limit diversity programs gains momentum in states
- Wisconsin prison inmate pleads not guilty to killing cellmate
- Waukesha man sentenced to 30 years for Sex Trafficking
- 12-year-old shot in Milwaukee Wednesday with ‘serious injuries’
- Milwaukee man convicted of laundering proceeds of business email compromise fraud schemes
- Giuliani, Meadows among 18 indicted in Arizona fake electors case
- Some State Bar diversity participants walk away from program
- Wisconsin court issues arrest warrant ‘in error’ for Minocqua Brewing owner
- Iranian nationals charged cyber campaign targeting U.S. Companies
WLJ People
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Russell Nicolet
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Benjamin Nicolet
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Dustin T. Woehl
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Katherine Metzger
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Joseph Ryan
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – James M. Ryan
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Dana Wachs
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Mark L. Thomsen
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Matthew Lein
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Jeffrey A. Pitman
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – William Pemberton
- Power 30 Personal Injury Attorneys – Howard S. Sicula
