Quantcast

Insurance — homeowners policies — duty to defend — abuse exclusion (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, May 16th, 2012 at 2:22 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP997 Jane Doe, et al. v. Thorin, et al.

Insurance — homeowners policies — non-insured location exclusions (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 at 11:10 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP564 Schinner v. Gundrum

Insurance — homeowners policies — duty to cooperate (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, January 10th, 2012 at 10:25 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP352 Auto-Owners Insurance Company vs. Holmes

Insurance — homeowners policies — occupation (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, December 1st, 2011 at 10:08 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2010AP2468 Johnson v. Mt. Morris Mut. Ins. Co.

2008AP2929 Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co. (access required)

POSTED: Friday, April 29th, 2011 at 1:36 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance Homeowners policies; family exclusion Where a family exclusion in a homeowners policy ambiguously defines “benefit,” the exclusion does not preclude coverage. “We conclude that Allstate has failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that a benefit of coverage would accrue directly or indirectly to an insured. To the extent that the terms of the [...]

2009AP2768 Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, October 19th, 2010 at 3:20 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance Homeowners policies; pollution exclusion Bat guano is not a pollutant under a homeowner’s policy’s pollution exclusion clause. “The policy definitions of ‘pollutant’ and ‘waste’ are further informed by the policy’s exclusionary clause itself, which omits coverage for the ‘discharge, release, escape, seepage, migration or dispersal of pollutants.’ None of those terms particularly suggest the [...]

Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202