Quantcast

Insurance – ERISA — disability benefits (access required)

11-1295 & 11-1427 Raybourne v. Cigna Life Insurance Co. of New York

Employment – ERISA — retaliation (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, September 5th, 2012 at 1:31 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

11-3291 George v. Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Inc.

Employment — ERISA (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, August 29th, 2012 at 9:34 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

10-3524 Schorsch v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.

Employment – ERISA — delegation (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, July 31st, 2012 at 11:25 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

12-1230 Aschermann v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

Employment – ERISA — disability (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, July 10th, 2012 at 11:07 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

10-1136 Marantz v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

Employment – ERISA — statutory penalties (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, April 19th, 2012 at 2:29 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

11-1112 Killian v. Concert Health Plan

ERISA plans may offset child’s Social Security benefits, says 7th Circuit (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, March 7th, 2012 at 11:42 am

BY: DOLAN MEDIA NEWSWIRES

Tags:

Employee benefit plans could reduce long-term disability benefits by the amount of Social Security disability benefits received by the plan participants’ dependent children, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Employment — ERISA (access required)

POSTED: Friday, March 2nd, 2012 at 9:44 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

11-2889 Schultz v. Avaiall, Inc Long Term Disability Plan

Employment — ERISA (access required)

10-3286 Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Waste Management of Michigan, Inc.

TORT REPORT: Made-whole doctrine can be effectively disclaimed in policy

POSTED: Thursday, October 27th, 2011 at 1:48 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

In Wisconsin, the made-whole doctrine has provided the insured with a legal right to pursue money from a tortfeasor to cover his or her losses.

Employment – ERISA – surviving spousal benefits (access required)

10-1521 Burns v. Orthotek, Inc., Employees’ Pension Plan and Trust

Employment – ERISA – breach of fiduciary duty (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, September 6th, 2011 at 2:05 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

09-4081 & 10-1755 Loomis v. Exelon Corp.

10-2284 & 10-3046 Kolbe & Kolbe Health & Welfare Benefit Plan v. The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc. (access required)

Employment
ERISA; attorney fees

10-1900 Frye v. Thompson Steel Co., Inc. (access required)

POSTED: Friday, September 2nd, 2011 at 1:11 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Employment
ERISA; offsets

10-1978, 10-2175 & 10-3713 Williams v. Rohm and Haas Pension Plan (access required)

Employment
ERISA; class actions; attorney fees

09-3884 Pearson v. Voith Paper Rolls, Inc. (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, August 25th, 2011 at 1:51 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Employment
ERISA; estoppel

10-3287 Carter v. Pension Plan of A. Finkel & Sons Co. (access required)

Employment
ERISA

10-1558 Sullivan v. CUNA Mutual Ins. Society (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, August 10th, 2011 at 12:49 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Employment
ERISA

10-1889 & 10-3083 Pakovich v. Verizon LTD Plan (access required)

POSTED: Monday, July 25th, 2011 at 11:20 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Employment
ERISA

10-2887 NewPage Wisconsin system, Inc., v. United Steel (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, July 12th, 2011 at 1:05 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Employment
ERISA; LMRA

10-3898 & 11-1006 Weitzenkamp v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of America (access required)

Insurance ERISA; self-reported symptoms limitation The failure to include a self-reported symptoms limitation in the summary plan description (“SPD”) prevents an ERISA plan from relying on it to discontinue benefits. “Here, the SPD clearly sets out that long-term benefits will be discontinued after twenty-four months if a participant’s disability is due to mental illness or [...]

2009AP1558 Steffens v. BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois (access required)

POSTED: Friday, July 8th, 2011 at 11:22 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance
ERISA

10-3917, 10-3918, 10-3988 & 10-3989 Thompson v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (access required)

Employment
ERISA; deference

10-2112 Jackman Financial Corp. v. Humana Ins. Co. (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 at 11:58 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance ERISA; facility-of-payment clauses Where a life insurance policy contained a facility-of-payment clause, it did not violate ERISA for the insurer to pay the proceeds to the insured’s children. “Under the arbitrary and capricious standard, we overturn the administrator’s decision only where there is an absence of reasoning to support it. See Hess v. Reg-Ellen [...]

09-804 Cigna Corp. v. Amara (access required)

POSTED: Monday, May 16th, 2011 at 12:46 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

ERISA Equity Although ERISA does not give district courts authority to reform a pension plan, relief is authorized by sec. 502(a)(3), which allows a participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary “to obtain other appropriate equitable relief” to redress violations of ERISA “or the [plan’s] terms.” This Court has interpreted §502(a)(3)’s phrase “appropriate equitable relief” as referring to [...]

09-1750 In re: Motorola Securities Litigation (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, May 4th, 2011 at 11:10 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Securities ERISA; affiliated purchasers A corporation’s profit sharing plan cannot claim a share of the settlement of a securities fraud action. “[T]he Plan is an affiliate of Motorola and on this basis is excluded from the class, although we arrive at this conclusion by a slightly different analysis. The district court applied the ordinary meaning [...]

09-2326 Edwards v. Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan (access required)

POSTED: Friday, April 29th, 2011 at 1:43 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance ERISA Where an ERISA claimant failed to file a timely administrative appeal, the plan is not required to consider the appeal. “In this case, the Plan has fixed a clear deadline of 180 days for filing administrative appeals from denials of benefits, and the Plan has the right to enforce that deadline. Also, though [...]

10-1061 & 10-2749 Huss v. IBM Medical & Dental Plan (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 1:18 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

ERISA Attorney fees Where an insured obtains some success in suing an ERISA plan for denial of benefits, but may not ultimately prevail, the district court’s award of attorney fees is vacated pending reconsideration on remand. “We would be hesitant to conclude that the Defendants’ position, though unsuccessful in significant part, was so indefensible as [...]

09-3428, 09-3452, 09-3497, 10-1851, 10-2079 & 10-2091 Peabody v. Davis (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, April 12th, 2011 at 12:03 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

ERISA Breach of fiduciary duty; diversification Where a retirement plan failed to diversify despite the investment’s collapse, the plan was properly found liable for breach of fiduciary duty. “We agree with the district court that a prudent investor would not have remained so heavily invested in RIC’s stock as the company’s fortunes declined precipitously over [...]

10-1469 George v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. (access required)

POSTED: Monday, April 11th, 2011 at 11:45 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

ERISA Breach of fiduciary duty Summary judgment was improperly granted to the defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty claim under ERISA, where the 401(k) plan had a unitized structure. “[T]he district court’s grant of summary judgment rests on its finding that the undisputed facts established that defendants actually made a reasoned decision between the [...]

Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202