<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wisconsin Law Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wislawjournal.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wislawjournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brothers drop punitive claims against Wis. diocese</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/brothers-drop-punitive-claims-against-wis-diocese/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/brothers-drop-punitive-claims-against-wis-diocese/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensatory damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Feeney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Merryfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troy Merryfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/brothers-drop-punitive-claims-against-wis-diocese/&amp;text=Brothers drop punitive claims against Wis. diocese&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Two brothers who were molested by a priest have dropped their claims for punitive damages against the Catholic Diocese of Green Bay.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/brothers-drop-punitive-claims-against-wis-diocese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Posthumously conceived kids not entitled to benefits, rules US high court&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/posthumously-conceived-kids-not-entitled-to-benefits-rules-us-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/posthumously-conceived-kids-not-entitled-to-benefits-rules-us-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KIMBERLY ATKINS, Dolan Media Newswires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astrue v. Capato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/posthumously-conceived-kids-not-entitled-to-benefits-rules-us-high-court/&amp;text=Posthumously conceived kids not entitled to benefits, rules US high court&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
The Social Security Administration reasonably interpreted federal law in determining that only children supported by a deceased wage earner in his or her lifetime are entitled to Social Security benefits, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/posthumously-conceived-kids-not-entitled-to-benefits-rules-us-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party can’t recover cost of translating documents, rules US Supreme Court&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/party-cant-recover-cost-of-translating-documents-rules-us-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/party-cant-recover-cost-of-translating-documents-rules-us-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Murphy, Dolan Media Newswires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/party-cant-recover-cost-of-translating-documents-rules-us-supreme-court/&amp;text=Party can’t recover cost of translating documents, rules US Supreme Court&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
A defendant that prevailed in a personal injury case filed in federal court could not recover its costs for translat­ing documents from Japanese to English, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 6-3 decision.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/party-cant-recover-cost-of-translating-documents-rules-us-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court: Parent’s years of residency not imputed to alien child&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/high-court-parents-years-of-residency-not-imputed-to-alien-child/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/high-court-parents-years-of-residency-not-imputed-to-alien-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KIMBERLY ATKINS, Dolan Media Newswires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Immigration Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder v. Gutierrez and Holder v. Sawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/high-court-parents-years-of-residency-not-imputed-to-alien-child/&amp;text=High court: Parent’s years of residency not imputed to alien child&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
The Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that a parent’s years of residency are not imputed to a child is a permissible construction of federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/high-court-parents-years-of-residency-not-imputed-to-alien-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Procedure &#8212; equal protection &#8212; peremptory challenges&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-equal-protection-peremptory-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-equal-protection-peremptory-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th Circuit Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peremptory challenges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-equal-protection-peremptory-challenges/&amp;text=Criminal Procedure &#8212; equal protection &#8212; peremptory challenges&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
10-1434 Harris v. Hardy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-equal-protection-peremptory-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Property – foreclosure &#8212; possession&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/property-foreclosure-possession/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/property-foreclosure-possession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterstone Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/property-foreclosure-possession/&amp;text=Property – foreclosure &#8212; possession&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP473 Waterstone Bank SSB vs. Heller, et al.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/property-foreclosure-possession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Procedure &#8212; ineffective assistance&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-43/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-43/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ineffective assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-43/&amp;text=Criminal Procedure &#8212; ineffective assistance&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP793-CR State v. Raether]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-43/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motor Vehicles – OWI &#8212; reasonable suspicion&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/motor-vehicles-owi-reasonable-suspicion-5/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/motor-vehicles-owi-reasonable-suspicion-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicles Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable suspicion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/motor-vehicles-owi-reasonable-suspicion-5/&amp;text=Motor Vehicles – OWI &#8212; reasonable suspicion&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP1841-CR State v. Macho]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/motor-vehicles-owi-reasonable-suspicion-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional Responsibility &#8212; revocation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-revocation-3/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-revocation-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Responsibility Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Supreme Court Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-revocation-3/&amp;text=Professional Responsibility &#8212; revocation&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP1654-D OLR v. Kelly]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-revocation-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional Responsibility &#8212; suspension&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-suspension-14/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-suspension-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Responsibility Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Supreme Court Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-suspension-14/&amp;text=Professional Responsibility &#8212; suspension&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2010AP2566-D OLR v. Boyle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/23/professional-responsibility-suspension-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
