<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wisconsin Law Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wislawjournal.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wislawjournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State Supreme Court denies request to release bar exam participants’ info (UPDATE)&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-supreme-court-considers-making-bar-exam-participants-public/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-supreme-court-considers-making-bar-exam-participants-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Zemlicka, jack.zemlicka@wislawjournal.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Bars Examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Prosser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacquelynn Rothstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open records law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Abrahamson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-supreme-court-considers-making-bar-exam-participants-public/&amp;text=State Supreme Court denies request to release bar exam participants’ info (UPDATE)&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Campaign contributions, arrest records and recall petition signatures are all available for public view in Wisconsin, but the state's Board of Bars Examiners is not subject to the same visibility when it comes to supplying information on bar exam applicants.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-supreme-court-considers-making-bar-exam-participants-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State justices seek rewrite on bylaw change for dues challenges (UPDATE)&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-justices-consider-altering-bar-arbitration-process-for-dues-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-justices-consider-altering-bar-arbitration-process-for-dues-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Zemlicka, jack.zemlicka@wislawjournal.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory dues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberta Howell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-justices-consider-altering-bar-arbitration-process-for-dues-challenges/&amp;text=State justices seek rewrite on bylaw change for dues challenges (UPDATE)&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
The State Bar will have to do some rewriting in order to get Wisconsin Supreme Court approval of a proposed bylaw change altering the path for challenges to dues spending.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/state-justices-consider-altering-bar-arbitration-process-for-dues-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wis. Supreme Court considers foreign lawyer rules (UPDATE)&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/wis-supreme-court-considers-foreign-lawyer-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/wis-supreme-court-considers-foreign-lawyer-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Zemlicka, jack.zemlicka@wislawjournal.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Bar Examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign-educated attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacquelynn Rothstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N. Patrick Crooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Abrahamson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/wis-supreme-court-considers-foreign-lawyer-rules/&amp;text=Wis. Supreme Court considers foreign lawyer rules (UPDATE)&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
The state Supreme Court delayed a decision Wednesday on a proposal to formalize a process in which foreign-educated lawyers would be eligible to take the Wisconsin bar exam, pending further review of the criteria.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/wis-supreme-court-considers-foreign-lawyer-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance &#8212; homeowners policies &#8212; duty to defend &#8212; abuse exclusion&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/insurance-homeowners-policies-duty-to-defend-abuse-exclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/insurance-homeowners-policies-duty-to-defend-abuse-exclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duty to defend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeowners policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/insurance-homeowners-policies-duty-to-defend-abuse-exclusion/&amp;text=Insurance &#8212; homeowners policies &#8212; duty to defend &#8212; abuse exclusion&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP997 Jane Doe, et al. v. Thorin, et al.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/insurance-homeowners-policies-duty-to-defend-abuse-exclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Procedure &#8212; issue preclusion&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/criminal-procedure-issue-preclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/criminal-procedure-issue-preclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue preclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perronne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/criminal-procedure-issue-preclusion/&amp;text=Criminal Procedure &#8212; issue preclusion&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP1731-CR State v. Perronne]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/criminal-procedure-issue-preclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family – maintenance &#8212; imputed income&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-maintenance-imputed-income/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-maintenance-imputed-income/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imputed income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-maintenance-imputed-income/&amp;text=Family – maintenance &#8212; imputed income&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP2010 In re the marriage of: Bare v. Bare]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-maintenance-imputed-income/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family &#8212; protective placement &#8212; waiver of appearance&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-protective-placement-waiver-of-appearance/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-protective-placement-waiver-of-appearance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron B.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver of appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-protective-placement-waiver-of-appearance/&amp;text=Family &#8212; protective placement &#8212; waiver of appearance&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP2287-FT In the matter of the guardianship of Aaron B.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/family-protective-placement-waiver-of-appearance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motor Vehicles – OWI &#8212; prior convictions &#8212; collateral attacks&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/motor-vehicles-owi-prior-convictions-collateral-attacks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/motor-vehicles-owi-prior-convictions-collateral-attacks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicles Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior convictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwandt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/motor-vehicles-owi-prior-convictions-collateral-attacks-2/&amp;text=Motor Vehicles – OWI &#8212; prior convictions &#8212; collateral attacks&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP2301-CR State v. Schwandt]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/motor-vehicles-owi-prior-convictions-collateral-attacks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juveniles &#8212; TPR; ineffective assistance&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/juveniles-tpr-ineffective-assistance-3/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/juveniles-tpr-ineffective-assistance-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ineffective assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juveniles Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khalasia M.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/juveniles-tpr-ineffective-assistance-3/&amp;text=Juveniles &#8212; TPR; ineffective assistance&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP2846 In re the termination of parental rights to Khalasia M.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/juveniles-tpr-ineffective-assistance-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure &#8212; Administrative law &#8212; statute of limitations&#160;</title>
		<link>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/civil-procedure-administrative-law-statute-of-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/civil-procedure-administrative-law-statute-of-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscriber only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI Court of Appeals Digest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wislawjournal.com/?p=47097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="display: block;margin-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/civil-procedure-administrative-law-statute-of-limitations/&amp;text=Civil Procedure &#8212; Administrative law &#8212; statute of limitations&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://wislawjournal.com/files/2011/04/padlock-gold.png" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=wpglamour"><img align="left" src="http://wislawjournal.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
2011AP1529 Baker v. DHS]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wislawjournal.com/2012/05/16/civil-procedure-administrative-law-statute-of-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
