The Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors is expected to fire the county’s top in-house attorney Thursday.
Eager to cut costs, large firms nationwide are taking some of their employees out of the office.
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Civil Civil Rights — equal protection — class-of-one A clear showing of animus, even absent a robust comparison to a similarly situated individual, may sustain a class-of-one equal protection claim. “In the present case, where the direct showing of animus was very strong, Swanson’s pointing to [...]
2011AP2802-CR State v. Klotz
2012AP763 Burrows et al. v. Progressive Classic Insurance Co. et al.
2012AP1137-CR State v. Cherry
2012AP1800-CR State v. Bilton
If a woman claims she was going faster than 90 mph in a 55 mph zone to get away from an unknown vehicle that was terrorizing her and following her every move, can the trial court legally recognize this as a “necessity” defense for speeding?
Plaintiffs Rockwell Automation Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, and Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc., an Ohio corporation, filed a lawsuit Nov. 16, 2010, in federal court against defendants Germantown-based WAGO Corp. and its German parent company, WAGO Kontakttechnik GmbH & Co. KG.
12-1124 U.S. v. Loffredi
2011AP2823-CR State v. Girard
2012AP644, 2012AP1093, 2012AP1829 In re the Estate of Louise Selenske
2012AP717 State ex rel. Daniels v. State
2012AP2009 State v. Moore
2012AP2557-CR State v. Bokenyi
2013AP39 City of Superior v. Bachinski
2013AP85 In the matter of the refusal of Bradley H. Hart
2012AP2551-FT Central Bank v. Duncan
2012AP1339-CR State v. Betters
2013AP48 Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
2012AP2256 & 2012AP2257 Pasko v. Milwaukee County
2009AP2916-CR State v. Sahs
With the economy still recovering and a challenging job market for new law graduates, some have likened making partner at a medium or large law firm to winning the lottery.
In an attempt to make the Wisconsin Supreme Court more nonpartisan, the Wisconsin State Bar is in the early stages of a potential push to limit state justices to single, 16-year terms.
12-2790 U.S. v. Richards
11-3411 U.S. v. Gulley
12-3881 Findlay v. Lendermon
12-71 Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona Inc.
11-9335 Alleyne v. U.S.
12-416 FTC v. Actavis Inc.
