Quantcast
Home / Opinion /

Opinion

Sufficiency of Evidence

Virginia “Ginger” Mourning appeals the grant of summary judgment for her former employer, Ternes Packaging–Indiana, Inc., on her claims that Ternes fired her because she is a woman, in violation of her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and because she took medical leave that was protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2615.

Read More »

Proper Venue

Wine and Canvas Development, LLC, Anthony Scott, Tamara McCracken, and Donald McCracken sued Christopher Muylle, Theodore Weisser, YN Canvas CA, LLC, Art Uncorked LLC, and Weisser Management Group LLC, bringing federal trademark and state law claims.

Read More »

Abuse of Discretion

Union Pacific Railroad challenges the legal authority of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to continue an enforcement action after issuing a right to sue letter and subsequent resolution of the underlying charges of discrimination in a private lawsuit.

Read More »

Abuse of Discretion

Plaintiffs are former arbitrators for the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission. In 2011, plaintiffs and another arbitrator brought a due process action challenging the implementation of House Bill 1698, a workers’ compensation reform statute that had terminated their six‐ year appointments under prior law.

Read More »

Jurisdiction

Regency Corporation operated for‐profit cosmetology schools in 20 states. Each Regency Beauty Institute offered both classroom instruction and practical instruction in a “Regency Salon,” where members of the public could receive cosmetology services at low prices.

Read More »

Attorney Fees

Cross-Appellants Eric Hurkman, Richard McGeehan, and Timothy Wrzesinski appeal the probate court’s denial of their individual requests for attorney fees and costs from the estate of Harold Hartshorne related to the real property date-of-death valuation the personal representatives used in the inventory, interim accounting, and federal real estate tax return filings for the estate.

Read More »

Termination of Parental Rights

On appeal, K.J. and A.W. argue that: (1) the circuit court erred when it denied the parents’ postdisposition motions without a hearing; (2) the circuit court had no competence to proceed with Diane’s second TPR because the underlying CHIPS order expired following the denial of the State’s first TPR petition; (3) issue preclusion applied to the second TPR trial and counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue; (4) the circuit court erroneously considered evidence relating to the abuse of Diane’s older brother; and (5) a finding of error causing reversal of Diane’s case would necessitate reversal of Andrew’s case pursuant to the doctrine of prejudicial spillover. We address each issue.

Read More »