2010AP1277 State v. Mack

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 3, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Successive appeals

A’Kim Mack, a/k/a Kelvin Mack, pro se, appeals from an order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motion. To avoid the procedural bar of State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), Mack submits that he received information that his trial attorney had a conflict of interest and that this information constitutes newly discovered evidence. We reject Mack’s argument and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP1277 State v. Mack

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cimpl, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Mack, A’Kim, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; O’Neil, Aaron R., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event