Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP839-CR State v. Colon

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 19, 2011//

2010AP839-CR State v. Colon

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 19, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Christian R. Colon appeals a decision and order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. Colon argues that: (1) the State breached a plea agreement by unilaterally withdrawing it when Colon refused to testify against a co-defendant because the State played a direct role in Colon’s decision not to testify and thereby violated his right to due process; (2) he was entitled to a hearing on the issue; (3) his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to the State’s withdrawal and sentence recommendation and for not advising Colon that he could seek to withdraw his plea; and (4) he was entitled to a Machner hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP839-CR State v. Colon

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Kessler, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Bizzaro, Amelia L., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Moeller, Marguerite M., Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests