By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 15, 2011//
Sentencing
Accurate information; bias
Krystyna Gruszczynski appeals a judgment convicting her of five counts of felony theft of an amount between $2,500 and $5,000 and an order denying postconviction relief. At sentencing, the circuit court rejected a plea agreement’s recommendation and imposed the maximum confinement allowed. Gruszczynski claims her due process rights were violated because the sentencing court relied on inaccurate information and was objectively biased. She also claims the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to consider the sentencing objectives and by imposing an unduly harsh and excessive sentence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP2417-CR State v. Gruszczynski
Dist III, Marinette County, Miron, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Schmaal, William E., Madison; Fite, Shelley, Madison; For Respondent: Brey, Allen R., Marinette; Remington, Christine A., Madison