Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP2417-CR State v. Gruszczynski

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 15, 2011//

2010AP2417-CR State v. Gruszczynski

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 15, 2011//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Accurate information; bias

Krystyna Gruszczynski appeals a judgment convicting her of five counts of felony theft of an amount between $2,500 and $5,000 and an order denying postconviction relief. At sentencing, the circuit court rejected a plea agreement’s recommendation and imposed the maximum confinement allowed. Gruszczynski claims her due process rights were violated because the sentencing court relied on inaccurate information and was objectively biased. She also claims the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to consider the sentencing objectives and by imposing an unduly harsh and excessive sentence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2417-CR State v. Gruszczynski

Dist III, Marinette County, Miron, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Schmaal, William E., Madison; Fite, Shelley, Madison; For Respondent: Brey, Allen R., Marinette; Remington, Christine A., Madison

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests