Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP533-CR State v. Powells

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 13, 2011//

2010AP533-CR State v. Powells

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 13, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance; newly discovered evidence; postconviction DNA tests

Rudolph D. Powells appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm by a felon, and from an order denying his postconviction motions for relief. He contends that: (1) the circuit court should have excluded 911 caller identification evidence and a shell casing from a separate domestic violence incident; (2) the circuit court should have allowed him to argue that two other individuals had access to the murder weapon; (3) defense counsel should have moved to suppress a mask and gun; (4) the circuit court should have granted him a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence showing that the apartment where the 911 call originated was leased to a third party; and (5) the circuit court should have ordered postconviction DNA testing on a beer can found near the crime scene and additional discovery relating to phone records. We reject each of these contentions and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP533-CR State v. Powells

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Redding, Joseph E., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Moeller, Marguerite M., Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests