By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 11, 2011//
Criminal Procedure
Discovery; DNA testing
Roy James Jones, pro se, appeals from circuit court orders denying two postconviction motions, which sought new DNA testing of certain evidence. The circuit court denied the first motion because Jones refused to turn over the results of private DNA testing that his attorney commissioned before trial, meaning Jones failed to satisfy the statutory prerequisites to court-ordered DNA testing. The circuit court denied the second motion after Jones demanded concessions in exchange for his disclosure of the test results. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motions, and we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP779-CR State v. Jones
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Konkol, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Jones, Roy James, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee