2010AP298 State v. Hampton

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 11, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Garland H. Hampton, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Hampton argues that the postconviction court erred when it denied his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence without holding a hearing. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP298 State v. Hampton

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hampton, Garland H., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Wren, Christopher G., Madison

Full Text

Related Content

Weekly Case Digests

Weekly Case Digests – March 21, 2022 - March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

Termination of Parental Rights

Jessica appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (TPR) to her daughter, and an order denying her [...]

March 24, 2022

Abuse of Discretion – Evidentiary Hearing

Willie Allison appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of three counts of human t[...]

March 24, 2022

Court Error – Postconviction Motion Denied

Robert C. Stryker, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and an [...]

March 24, 2022

Divorce – Child Placement Order

Julie C. Valadez appeals from a judgment of divorce terminating her marriage to her former husband, Ricardo Va[...]

March 24, 2022

Sentence Credit

Tanya M. Liedke appeals from an order denying her motion for correction of sentence credit.

March 24, 2022

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event