By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 4, 2011//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 4, 2011//
Civil Procedure
Amended complaints
Jeanine L. Jackson, Cheyenne S. McKinney-Jackson, and Judith Jackson, pro se, appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and granting Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services’ (collectively “Toyota”) motion to dismiss. Because we conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the Jacksons’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and that the circuit court properly concluded that the Jacksons’ assertion that Toyota “hired” Select Recovery did not set forth a claim on which relief could be granted, we affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
2009AP2941 Jackson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, et al.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cooper, J., Brennan, J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Jackson, Jeanine L., Jackson, Judith, McKinney-Jackson, Cheyenne S., pro se; For Respondent: Lawless, Lisa M., Milwaukee; Salberg, Amy Marie, Milwaukee; Mitich, Rebecca H., Milwaukee