Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP2759-CR State v. Harris

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 2, 2010//

2009AP2759-CR State v. Harris

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 2, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Plea withdrawal; ineffective assistance

Morris L. Harris appeals a judgment of conviction for substantial battery, see Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2007-2008), and from the subsequent order denying his postconviction motion. Harris argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when denying his motion to withdraw his plea; (2) the trial court conducted an improper, prejudicial preliminary hearing; (3) the trial court erroneously determined that the State’s withholding of certain evidence did not constitute grounds for withdrawal of his plea; (4) his counsel was ineffective; and (5) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2009AP2759-CR State v. Harris

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Fiorenza, Kuhnmuench, JJ., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Grass, Gary, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests