Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP1974-CR State v. Bogan

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 21, 2010//

2009AP1974-CR State v. Bogan

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 21, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Franklin Chaneal Bogan appeals from judgments of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief without a hearing. Bogan asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call two witnesses to testify at Bogan’s bail jumping trial. We conclude that, even assuming that the allegations in Bogan’s postconviction motion are true, Bogan is not entitled to relief on his ineffective-assistance claim. Therefore, we affirm the judgments and order. This opinion shall not be published.

2009AP1974-CR State v. Bogan

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Van Grunsven, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Cornwall, Andrea Taylor, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Lloyd, Katherine Desmond, Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests