2009AP1657 State v. Howard

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 21, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Successive appeals

Michael Howard, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to cure an excessive sentence. Howard argues his sentence exceeds the maximum penalty authorized by statute. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP1657 State v. Howard

Dist III, Brown County, Bischel, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Howard, Michael F., pro se; For Respondent: Losse, Michael J., Madison; Zakowski, John P., Green Bay

Full Text

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Postconviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Steven Seekamp appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of methamphetamine, as a repeater, and mai[...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event